Friday, May 27, 2011

Attention Grabbers


Rights and Obligations of Medical Patients

Have you paid your doctor a visit recently?  If you have, do you recall having seen conspicuously posted in the clinic a large poster listing your rights and obligations as patients?  As medical patients, you have 14 “medical” and “nine” societal rights.  So you have 24 rights all together.  Your first right is, right to good health care and human treatment.

You, too, have obligations, don’t you ever forget.  Your first obligation is, “know your rights.”  Do you realize that knowing one’s rights as medical patient is extremely important that it’s the first obligation one must abide by?

Or, should the question be, “do you visit your doctor at all?”  You’ll get a first hand experience of the consequences of not visiting your doctor regularly when you grow older, if you get there.

Physically sick or not, your second obligation should be, “see your doctor now.”  And the third should be: “next time you visit your doctor, look for the list of your rights and obligations as medical patient.”  Copy the list so you can bring it wherever you go.

***

Are GSIS People More Patriotic Now?

GSIS members living in Laguna must have visited the GSIS Center in Pagsanjan, Laguna.  Beautiful structure, I must say.  I was there last week to swipe my e-Card.  The G-WASP kiosk at UPLB has not been working the last year or so,  and Pagsanjan is the option.

I got there rather early, about 7:45 am, and there were already people, mostly standing and moving around in the lobby.  A couple of individuals were swiping their cards, so I joined the queque.  Before I could swipe my card, however, the public address system blared the Philippine National Anthem.  So I had to stand at attention, facing the flag pole outside the building where a security officer was raising the flag.  After the national anthem, came the recitation of the “Pledge of Allegiance to the Filipino Flag,” something I used to know by heart when I was in elementary school.  I have forgotten some of it now.

When the ceremony was over, everybody rushed to their respective stations and began entertaining visitors who had businesses with the GSIS.

I don’t know if this is the standard practice now in all GSIS branches throughout the country, but if it is, then it’s a good practice.  I wonder, however, if the flag raising ceremony at the GSIS in Pagsanjan is a daily routine.  I know that flag ceremonies were used to be held on Monday mornings and Friday afternoons, at the beginning and end of the work-week.

***

“Road Barricade”

One practice that I don’t appreciate is when people, including students, stretch ropes across national roads to stop motorists and ask for donations for activities that are not related to the interests of motorists.  Last Sunday, when Jegs and I were driving to Lipa City, through Barangay Masaya in Bay, we were being stopped by students of the Masaya Elementary School with a rope stretching across the road with the poster, “a  Project of the Student Government.”  This shouldn’t be done for two reasons: one, it’s dangerous to traffic; and two, you don’t simply ask for donations or even alms just like that. 

As things are, motorists are already heavily taxed in this country.  The cost of petrol, which is higher in this country compared to anywhere else in the world, is unbelievably very high.  And there seems to be no end to the increasing cost of petrol that motorists just have to bear.

In any case, I wonder if stopping motorists on the road for alms is what public school teachers teach children in elementary schools.  This is not “good character and right conduct” which public schools are supposed to promote and teach.

So, since Jegs was driving I simply suggested, “your flasher” to signal the kids that we’re not going to give up a single centavo for such stupid and illegal project.  Youth organizations in various Barangays do this, too.  Even older individuals do this in a different way, like they stand along a railroad crossing holding a shovel on one hand and a plastic cup on the other.  When a vehicle passes by, the individual simply offers the cup where the motorist could drop coins, if he wishes to. 

Frequently, the individual who does this has no money for alcoholic drink, so he has to pretend he was being helpful by filling pot holes with earth.  Absolutely stupid.  He doesn’t do what he seems to be saying he’s doing, i.e., filling pot holes with earth, or something to that effect.  Further, he has no business being there not being a laborer of the railroad company.  Finally, he’s asking you to give him drinking money, for no reason at all.  That’s highway robbery, pure and simple.  That’s also clear demonstration of one being absolutely lazy and discourteous at best.  Why should it be the responsibility of motorists to give him alcohol money?

***

Improving Service at LTO Provincial Branches

I visited the LTO Branch Office in Pila, Laguna yesterday to renew my driver’s license.  The system at the Pila LTO Office seems efficient and effective.  I got there about 7:45 am and an LTO staff was already entertaining early birds.  I joined the queque and was instructed to go for medical exam and drug test.  After the standard physical exam (i.e., test for vision, physical appearance, and physical disabilities) I was instructed to go to the urine lab after having Xeroxed my medical exam report.  From the urine lab, I returned to the queque at LTO, where I was assigned another number and my papers labeled “Senior” before I was directed to Window 3 to submit said papers.  I was told to wait since my name would be called.

After some time, probably about 20 minutes, my name was called at window 1, where my picture was taken.  Then I was told to proceed to window 5 and wait for my name to be called so I could pay my fees.  This was a long wait, possibly a couple of hours, because all applicants converge at the Cashier’s window and there was only one cashsier.  When my name was finally called I paid my fees.  Then I was instructed to proceed to Window 4 and wait for my name to be called.  This was about 30 minutes waiting time.  To make a long story short, I got my OR and my new Driver’s License in four hours.

This could have been just a couple of hours had I decided to renew my Driver’s License electronically in Metro-Manila or at the Alabang Town Center, but I was already used to the Pila system.  In the past, this could have taken me a whole day, with the help of fixers.  This time around, without the help of fixers, I was able to get my driver’s license in four hours, plus the good experience of having to go through the process.

While waiting for my name to be called, I sat on the bench nearest the service windows.  This bench was labeled (at the back) “Seniors, Handicapped, Pregnant Women.”  While seated on this bench (I had to squeeze myself into position), at least for a couple of times a staff of LTO had to announce in Filipino, “to those seating on the front bench reserved for Seniors, kindly vacate your seat.  Don’t worry, you’ll be Seniors someday.”  Well, those seated on said bench were in their early twenties.

At this point, I must compliment the LTO staff.  They were all trying to be pleasant, in spite of some unreasonable people in the crowd, like that foreigner who was scolding his son so loudly that most people could hear him (in my youth I could have given him a good upper cut).  He was probably trying to call some attention because he was foreigner.  Or perhaps he was simply venting his frustrations to his son about the long wait.  Quite a number of people were visibly irked by such behavior.  Those kinds of people do not last long. 

The LTO people were trying to smile at everybody.  They were gracious and respectful.  The problem was that there were individuals who simply couldn’t wait for their turn and had to squeeze others out of queque.  Fortunately, LTO officials were watchful of these antics, and were quick to correct the error.

While at LTO in Pila, I got an opportunity to talk to people and learned that in the last couple of years there have been an abrupt increase in the number of people applying for driver’s licenses.  An old friend who happened to be at LTO Pila while I was there told me that there were very many applying for new driver’s licenses.  And this happens everyday, he says.   He said that this could be an indication that more and more people would probably be going into tricycle driving since they are unable to find regular jobs.

And while we’re on the topic of tricycle driving, did you know that in Metro-Manila last year (2010) the total number of road accidents was 380 and that 33.75% (about 128) of these road accidents involved motorcycles?  If we go by this ratio, extrapolated to the national level, there were 14,847 vehicular accidents in the country for a period of 10 months (January to October) in 2010 as reported by the PNP Highway Patrol Group, more than 5,000 must have involved motorcycles.  That’s not hard to believe, given the recklessness level of both motorcycle and tricycle drivers, which, to me, is phenomenal, to say the least.

***

Trends in Education

According to CHED, more than 2.5 million will enroll in various colleges and universities this school year.  Last year, a slightly lower number enrolled.  CHED also estimates that about half of all high school graduates will not enroll in college because of financial reasons.  DepEd reported that more than one million graduated from high school last year and should be enrolling in college this school year.  However, half may be enrolling in vocational courses, while others might already have entered the labor market.

CHED data indicate that the top five academic areas most preferred by students this school year are: business administration and related fields (about 640,000), medical and allied sciences (almost 421,000), education and teacher training (about 375,000), engineering and technology (more than 325,000), and information technology (more than 327,000).  Now, when these people complete their studies in four years time, would the jobs be there?

Another  trend, this time reported by DepEd, is a bit scary.  The DepEd reported that the performance of high school students and graduates in the NAT has been declining the past years, say, from 2005 to 2010.  The HS mean percentage score (MPS) of 49.26% in 2007-2009 went down to 47.4% in 2008-2009, and down further to 46.3% in 2009-2010.  With such performance in the National Achievement Test, these individuals will certainly perform very badly in college.

Unfortunately, raising the standards of education in the country doesn’t seem to be a significant priority of government today.  That’s my own personal feeling, but I’d be extremely glad to be proven wrong.

And by the way, we should expect more Filipinos born to poor families that can’t afford to provide proper nutrition to ensure mental preparedness for school.  Some sectors of Philippine society are doing all they can to prevent the RH Bill from getting approved.  Such RH Law could help improve mental conditions of children, and consequently result in better education, but that doesn’t seem to be appreciated by some quarters.

***

University Rankings, Anyone?

According to the QS World University Rankings, UP, which is ranked first in the country, is ranked 62 compared to other universities in other countries.  Ateneo is ranked 68, UST is ranked 104, and DLSU is ranked 107.

I do have reservations about rankings of universities.  The criteria are not clear and often the organization that does the rankings base its rankings on obsolete information.  When I was Chancellor of UPOU, the UP System questioned the methodology employed by the organization making the rankings.  When informed that UP was not participating in the survey in 2005, the organization that was doing the rankings still included UP in its rankings, but based the rank on old and incomplete information about UP.  UP was still ranked first in the country and 64th internationally.  So, when UP decided not to participate, it was still ranked but had to be given lower rank.

The UP administration tried to search for information related to the ranking project and found that the organization responsible for doing the ranking was actually doing it  for business purposes.  An increasing number of international students refer to these rankings in their choices of universities to attend.  Then, of course, the publisher was getting advertisements in the book which carried the rankings.  At least one of the four Philippine universities included in the rankings (not UP) advertised in said publication.

Still, the declining ranks of Philippine universities is alarming, at the very least.  There’s a trick here, somewhere.  Our universities must have access to funding for their academic programs, increase funds for research and publications, increase the number of faculty members with advanced academic degrees (like PhD), and increase drastically the number of foreign students enrolled.  These four items appear to be significant items in the survey for university rankings. 

Net effect?  Philippine universities are automatically disenfranchised in the World Rankings of Universities.  Why?  Funding for public universities can hardly be increased, and any increase in expenses incurred by private universities would certainly be translated into increased school fees.  Net losers: students.  One should note that those universities with high ranks are universities who’ve been spending huge budgets to improve their programs and facilities, including huge salaries of faculty members, as well as advertising.

Talking about faculty salaries, the last time I checked (which was about 10 years ago) an Associate Professor at National Singapore University was getting annually about Singapore Dollars 105,000, which translated to something like P1.96M.  Today, that same amount in Singapore Dollars would amount to something like P2.64M.  How much does an Associate Professor get today at UP?  About one-fourth of  what one would get at NUS.

I can only say, Filipino professors just grin and bear it due to “patriotism.”  Tsk, tsk, tsk.  Such sweet lemoning!!!

###

Friday, May 13, 2011

Issues Worth Connecting With

UPOU Graduation

Newly-installed UP President Alfred Pascual was UPOU’s Guest of Honor during its graduation ceremonies on 7 May 2011.  “I hope that you have imbibed the values of UP and are ready to help us save our country with the new skills you’ve learned,” he addressed the graduates.  He emphasized that “we expect a lot from you not because we have a reputation to protect but because we have a country to save.”

Another point that President Pascual mentioned in his speech that made such address memorable to UPOU faculty, staff, and students is the importance he said he attaches to UPOU.  He declared, “this is my second visit to UPOU, a sign of the importance I put on distance education in general and the UPOU in particular.”  That was good to hear.  Another line that sounded great was, “UPOU occupies special place in the UP System because its trail blazing and innovative teaching has enabled our leaders to have access to quality education.

Access to quality education is part of UPOU’s advocacies.  Indeed, one of the graduates who were awarded their academic degrees was Sen. Juan Miguel Zubiri, who graduated with the degree Master of Environment and Natural Resources Management (MENRM).  A few years back, now Vice President Jejomar Binay graduated with the degree Diploma in Environment and Natural Resources Management (DNRM).   These are people who’re making a difference in the development of the Philippines.

Serious professionals who see the need for quality education have graduated from or are students of the UPOU.  Richard Gomez, a couple of years ago, graduated with the Associate in Arts (AA) degree and he is now a student under the Bachelor of Arts in Media Studies (BAMS) program.  Sharon Cuneta, Jackie Lou Blanco, and Sarah Geronimo are students of the AA Program.  Like Goma, these guys are serious students.

The bulk of UPOU students are professionals (within or outside the country) who do not have time to go back to study in various residential campuses.  Increasingly, UPOU is host to both foreigners and foreign-based Filipino professionals.  The UPOU now has Testing Centers (Philippine Consular Offices) in more than 20 countries.
 ***


Transmigration, Philippine Style

Buried in the inside pages of one of the dailies the other day was a news item treated as of minor importance.  It was about a mass migration plan of the government regarding informal settlers in Metro-Manila.  The program, which was announced by P-Noy before ASEAN Leaders meeting in Jakarta a few days ago, calls for the mass migration of informal settlers in Metro-Manila to the provinces.

Accordingly, 500,000 families informally settling in various government and private land in Metro-Manila shall be  relocated to the provinces.  The report also claimed that the land inventories of the Department of Agriculture and Department of Environment and Natural Resources  are enough to provide these families two (2) hectares each of farm lands in the different provinces. 

This mass migration concept is similar to Indonesia's transmigration program a couple of decades ago, which enabled the Indonesia Government to mass transfer people from crowded Java to the other islands of Indonesia.  Like the Philippines, Indonesia is a huge archipelago.  It has 17,000 islands, which is about 10,000 more than that of the Philippines.

Older students of Philippine development should recall that in the 1950s, during the Presidency of the late Ramon Magsaysay, a law was passed to resettle people who wanted to resettle in Mindanao.  I had a lot of friends who took advantage of that program called the Homestead Program.  P-Noy’s mass migration program is the same except that the beneficiaries this time are only informal settlers of Metro-Manila.  I understand that one of the requirements of this mass migration, for a family to receive two hectares of land from the government, is that the family will have to cultivate such land and at least eke out a living from it so they may ceased to be completely dependent on dole outs from the government and from other people on the streets.

I believe in and support the spirit of this program.  I hope it doesn’t end-up being a corruption-breeding program.
 ***


RH Bill Becoming a Religious War?

I can’t believe what I’m observing.  The RH Bill has become a religious conflict, the Roman Catholic Church in the Philippines on one hand, and the other religious denominations in the country on the other.  I don’t know what these people have in mind, but going back to Age of the Crusades won’t solve our problem of too many people living in a small country that can’t develop properly due to imbalances in the use of natural resources as well as due to largely corrupt government which has now come down to a corrupt society. 

The major problem seems to be the fact that a debate where on one side the debater argues from the point of view of theology and philosophy of religion, while on the other side the debater argues from the point of view of science, medicine, and economics.  This situation doesn’t have any chance of opposing parties arriving at a position of generally acceptable compromise, especially when both sides clearly don’t want to agree.

There is, however, a third side to this debate.  I’m referring to the side of the ordinary mortals, the ordinary poor Filipinos whose experience has been poverty and sickness who simply appeared in this world of nothingness not of their free will.  All their lives they have experienced being absolutely poor with no possible opportunities to improve their lives in sight.  These are the kinds of people you want to bring to this world?

Please have pity on them!  Maawa naman kayo!!
###

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Seven Billion in Six Months



On 31 October 2011, the population of the world will be 7,000,000,000, according to the UN report titled 2010 Revision of World Population Prospects, upon which a news item released a few days ago by Reuters was based.  This news item has been picked up by at least one Philippine daily, but hidden somewhere in the inside pages of the newspaper.  This is a large number, which I’m not used to because the numbers I deal with everyday are tiny numbers based on my income.  Hence, I find some difficulty appreciating the significance of these big numbers.  Bet let’s look at these figures beyond their literal meaning.

Elsewhere, it has also been reported that there are about 800M food producers (farmers) the world over today.  Interestingly, 200M people go hungry everyday, too.  They have nothing to eat.  Now, let me complete the picture using hypothetical figures as actual numbers are not available.  So there are 200M who have nothing to eat.  Perhaps we can guess that about two billion are eating once a day, 3 billion twice, and may be 1.7B three times daily.  And the 100M remaining?   They’re probably the people who overeat.  Even if we eliminate them, there’ll still be too many people in the world.  Still, they probably should reduce their food consumption so that what food they save can go to feeding the other 200M.

Clearly, we do have problems providing enough food for the vast majority of people in the world.  We should produce more food, as many believe.  There’s no argument against this idea except that there’s a limit to the capability of food producers to produce more food and the planet to continue providing resources for food production.  Food production cannot continue to grow infinitely to meet the food demands of a growing population because the planet will not permit it.  Some experts say that the planet can only support 10B population.  And by the end of October 2011, we will be 7B. 

Interestingly, amid this increasing world population, the populations of China and Russia are expected to decrease or contract, even if slowly.  For example, China has the biggest population today at 1.34 billion, but due to their ageing population and effective population control program, that country will have smaller population by 2100 – only one billion.  Russia, which has a population of 143M today, will have a population of 126M in 2050, and 111M in 2100.

In contrast, let’s have a look at the case of the Philippines.  We don’t have actual figures, but since we know our current population (92M), and population growth rate (2.8%), we can extrapolate.  I’ve tried doing it and arrived at these figures: population of 137M in 2025, and 275M in 2050.  I’d rather not calculate the expected number of Filipinos in the year 2100.  Where on earth are we going to get the food to feed the additional number of Pinoys?

We have rich agricultural lands that can produce the food?  Oh, that one.  At the rate our first class agricultural lands are being reclassified into built-up areas for residence, we’re running out of land on which to produce food.  Practically all of our agricultural lands have been converted to subdivisions.  What are left for cultivation are mountains that do not have water since we have destroyed practically all of our forests.

So, where’s the “tuwid na daan” here?  Not through the RH Bill, according to the CBCP, which has been, hammer and tong, fighting to prevent the Bill from becoming a law and conveniently avoiding offering reasonable alternative solutions to the rapidly growing population problem.  One wonders if the CBCP is not simply enjoying an increasing number of Filipinos who they expect to grow to be Catholics and contribute to the Sunday collections.

I’m not insinuating anything, just asking a rhetorical question.